Just update my 2 WS-12-250DC and left one on the bench testing. I never saw the spurious voltage and temp noise that we were seeing in the field, when on the bench however I just checked into the switch and there was an exclamation icon and the following:-
Jan 1 00:00:05 netonix: 1.4.0rc10 on WS-12-250-DC
Jan 1 00:00:09 system: Setting MAC address from flash configuration: EC:13:B2:81:xx:xx
Jan 1 00:00:11 system: starting ntpclient
Jan 1 00:00:12 admin: adding lan (eth0.770) to firewall zone lan
Jan 1 00:00:21 dropbear[777]: Running in background
Jan 1 00:00:26 system: starting ntpclient
Jan 1 00:00:26 switch[802]: Detected cold boot
Jan 1 00:00:27 switch[802]: PoE enabled on port 2, PoE Smart is starting cable check
Jan 1 00:00:28 switch[802]: PoE enabled on port 3, PoE Smart is starting cable check
Jan 1 00:00:29 kernel: link state changed to 'up' on port 1
Jan 1 00:00:32 switch[802]: Port 2 cable check results: Open, Open, Open, Open
Jan 1 00:00:32 switch[802]: Port 2 passed PoE Smart cable check, turning on power
Jan 1 00:00:32 switch[802]: Port 3 cable check results: Open, Open, Open, Open
Jan 1 00:00:32 switch[802]: Port 3 passed PoE Smart cable check, turning on power
Jan 1 00:46:28 switch[794]: 48V is out of range (32.6V)
Jan 1 00:46:32 system: starting ntpclient
Jan 1 00:46:40 switch[794]: 24V is out of range (22.6V)
Not sure if the switch took any notice, but certainly looks like we still have spurious stuff coming in, and now on the bench.
W
v1.4.0rc1-16 Bug reports and comments
-
Dave - Employee
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:28 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
what load do you have plugged into the switch ports that you turned on, and what is your power supply source?
these are real out of range failures, and with the code change probably not bogus, so we need to figure out whats up so
describing your setup will help.
these are real out of range failures, and with the code change probably not bogus, so we need to figure out whats up so
describing your setup will help.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
If your power source on your bench powering the switch does not have enough amperage this could happen.
What we can look into is having the switch shut OFF in the event the power source does not have enough amperage for the load.
The switch should start shedding or turning off POE ports in the event the powersource is of insufficient amperage to carry the load. We are looking into that.
How many amps does your power supply feeding the switch have, please provide specs on your power source.
But providing us more information on what your power source is, what is its specs and what were you powering on port 2 and 3 would help.
It appears the input amperage became insufficient?
What we can look into is having the switch shut OFF in the event the power source does not have enough amperage for the load.
The switch should start shedding or turning off POE ports in the event the powersource is of insufficient amperage to carry the load. We are looking into that.
How many amps does your power supply feeding the switch have, please provide specs on your power source.
But providing us more information on what your power source is, what is its specs and what were you powering on port 2 and 3 would help.
It appears the input amperage became insufficient?
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
Dave - Employee
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:28 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
what i meant was it might be possible that your power source in the lab has to low a current limit set on it, or possible bad connections, and if our dc-dc power supply can't get enough current it will still try & output it power to the main board, but it will not be able to keep the 48 volts at 48 volts because it is current starved so it will simply start dropping its output voltage, and that will also effect the 24 volt supply on the switch board.
that is why I am askign about your setup
that is why I am askign about your setup
- IntL-Daniel
- Experienced Member
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 5:07 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
IntL-Daniel wrote:I have higher CPU temp than you...
...but there are still the same conditions..nothing changed. Maybe different RPM vs Temp threshold values?
...just want to inform that since upgrade to 1.4.0rc10 these fan peaks disappeared (back to the same state like with 1.3.9). Also we saw total power consuption peaks over 200W while normally we never saw it before (with 1.3.9) and now with 1.4.0rc10. Maybe the power consuption peaks was the root cause of fan peaks... I did not do double check by downgrading back to 1.4.0.rc9 (our switch is in production).
Edit: ..and YES we have the switch in the plastic box but with the special wholes for fan output and wholes for air input and the box is in the air conditioned container (small room on the roof). The point of my posts were just description of the status of fan/power behaviour in 1.3.9 vs 1.4.0rc9 vs 1.4.0rc10
Last edited by IntL-Daniel on Sat Apr 09, 2016 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- IntL-Daniel
- Experienced Member
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 5:07 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
I have still the board at 53C with fan stable at 6500rpm now and hold (1.4.0rc10).
Last edited by IntL-Daniel on Sat Apr 09, 2016 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
lligetfa - Associate
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 12:12 pm
- Location: Fort Frances Ont. Canada
- Has thanked: 307 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
No fan on the MINI so cannot comment on that.
Right after flashing RC10, when I logged in I saw the total peak a couple of times and then settle down. The duration of the peaks were so short that when I clicked on each port to try to determine what was drawing it, the 3 sec graph had passed by. I don't recall seeing that before and have not seen it since.
IntL-Daniel wrote:Also we saw total power consuption peaks over 200W while normally we never saw it before (with 1.3.9)...
Right after flashing RC10, when I logged in I saw the total peak a couple of times and then settle down. The duration of the peaks were so short that when I clicked on each port to try to determine what was drawing it, the 3 sec graph had passed by. I don't recall seeing that before and have not seen it since.
-
wisp-wand - Member
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 4:59 pm
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
Dave wrote:what i meant was it might be possible that your power source in the lab has to low a current limit set on it, or possible bad connections, and if our dc-dc power supply can't get enough current it will still try & output it power to the main board, but it will not be able to keep the 48 volts at 48 volts because it is current starved so it will simply start dropping its output voltage, and that will also effect the 24 volt supply on the switch board.
that is why I am askign about your setup
Hi Dave, its a 24v SMPSU 2.5AMP. The switch has no load on it at all, just my ether cable plugged in so I can monitor.
It is configured for one of our tower sites, so a couple of the ports have POE enabled, but nothing connected. Screenshot of status page attached
Wayne
-
Dave - Employee
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:28 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
wayne
thanks, i am investigating this..for sure the latest rc code has vast improvements, but it seems i have to track down some floating ghost of a bug....
dave
thanks, i am investigating this..for sure the latest rc code has vast improvements, but it seems i have to track down some floating ghost of a bug....
dave
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.4.0rcX Bug reports and comments
Also be aware efficiency is so low because there is no load.
It is sort of counter intuitive that the efficiency goes up with load but it does.
It is sort of counter intuitive that the efficiency goes up with load but it does.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 59 guests