Ring
-
bradsdb - Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:46 pm
- Location: West Valley City, UT
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Ring
+1 I would pay quite a bit for that.. I wonder what that would take to make a switch with support for ERPS?
-
Eric Stern - Employee
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 130 times
Re: Ring
Wow thats incredible, are the current line of switches compatible with ERPS? Or will you need a new switch lineup?
-
Dave - Employee
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:28 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: Ring
same line...
Our software developer will contact you at some point to hopefully talk you into testing the rc release for us....
Our software developer will contact you at some point to hopefully talk you into testing the rc release for us....
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7415
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: Ring
It is supported by our existing switch core.
Eric hopes to release v1.4.7rc12 by Friday which will have this feature - ERPS
Eric hopes to release v1.4.7rc12 by Friday which will have this feature - ERPS
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
Eric Stern - Employee
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 130 times
Re: Ring
So it turns out this won't be as easy to implement as we first though. It can still be done, but will be a lot more work than we originally thought.
Why do you need this feature? It seems like it is just like MSTP but less useful (ERPS only works in a ring configuration, MSTP works in any configuration).
Why do you need this feature? It seems like it is just like MSTP but less useful (ERPS only works in a ring configuration, MSTP works in any configuration).
Re: Ring
Here is the best G.8032 explanation, and future enhancements. It will support a ladder topology instead of just rings eventually.
http://www.actusnetworks.com/new/html/2.pdf
But for me personally:
1. Convergence times for fault detection at 50ms out of the box (this is huge for those of us for customers with SLA's)
2. Extremely extremely simple to setup and it scales well
3.All our fiber vendors support G.8032, Calix, Accedian, etc... In a world that is going more to a Hybrid Fiber/Wireless scenario this gives us quite a few possibilities to build parts of our ring with wireless instead of 100% fiber.
Siklu is also coming out with backhauls that support ERP: http://www.balticnetworks.com/siklu-eth ... ennas.html
http://www.actusnetworks.com/new/html/2.pdf
But for me personally:
1. Convergence times for fault detection at 50ms out of the box (this is huge for those of us for customers with SLA's)
2. Extremely extremely simple to setup and it scales well
3.All our fiber vendors support G.8032, Calix, Accedian, etc... In a world that is going more to a Hybrid Fiber/Wireless scenario this gives us quite a few possibilities to build parts of our ring with wireless instead of 100% fiber.
Siklu is also coming out with backhauls that support ERP: http://www.balticnetworks.com/siklu-eth ... ennas.html
- jclendenan
- Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Ring
Cool!!! this would be a huge advantage to replace spanning tree protections 
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests