Passive versus af/at

Technical discussions about our hardware electronics with our product engineer.
User avatar
lligetfa
Associate
Associate
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 12:12 pm
Location: Fort Frances Ont. Canada
Has thanked: 307 times
Been thanked: 381 times

Passive versus af/at

Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:38 pm

One thing that sets Netonix apart from Ubiquiti is sticking with passive PoE for both voltages. I wonder what drove that decision? Personally I don't trust af/at auto detection in a hostile outdoor environment where one might get water in the cable, ground potential shift, or where surge protectors could affect the sensing. I don't really think there is a place for auto detection in a carrier network. Leave that to the SOHO and enterprise IT market.

User avatar
mike99
Associate
Associate
 
Posts: 837
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:53 am
Location: Quebec, Canada
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 245 times

Re: Passive versus af/at

Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:55 am

Seem like a decision to target the entreprise market. What I think is that sell must have been slowing down on the WISP market. AC isn't a game changer so I don't really expect WISP to renew their network until AC phase 2 (MU-MIMO). Until then, Ubnt must continue to sell device.

Return to Dave's Lab

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests