v1.3.9rc2 through rc14 - BETA/Release Candidate

DOWNLOAD THE LATEST FIRMWARE HERE
User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7416
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1608 times
Been thanked: 1325 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Wed Jan 20, 2016 4:07 pm

sakita wrote:RADIUS Secret is only allowing 26 characters (a 31 character string worked in previous versions).

I copied the string from one switch (running 1.3.9rc13) and pasted it to another (running 1.3.9rc14) and noticed it wasn't all there.

When I tried to type the last few characters the rc14 switch won't let me.

The rc13 switch is showing a red error box on the secret... but it must be using all of the characters that were there before the upgrade because I can still login with RADIUS.


We have been changing the UI/CLI to limit what the user can enter.

If you can image this, we have had many people try and succeed in blow up the UI/CLI by entering special characters and even entering SUPER SUPER LONG inputs. So we have started limiting the input fields to max lengths and limiting the characters that it allows the user to even enter.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

User avatar
sakita
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Location: Arizona, USA
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 80 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:45 pm

...that's good UI practice to clean up the data entry on the input-side (monkey control) :ak:

But why just 26 characters and why reduce it from previous length?

Some systems only allow shorter RADIUS secrets while some allow up to 127 (or even 128) characters. A quick review of the RADIUS RFC and it looks to me like anything up to 253 characters is possible... but due to the way it is implemented some choose to go as short as 16 characters. FreeRADIUS, is limited to 31 characters.

It seems to me that a length of 63 is a nice number that works out well with other PSK lengths (e.g. wireless encryption keys)... barring that, 31 seems like another logical number based on FreeRADIUS limiting it to that for some arbitrary reason.
Today is an average day: Worse than yesterday, but better than tomorrow.

User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7416
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1608 times
Been thanked: 1325 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:04 pm

sakita wrote:...that's good UI practice to clean up the data entry on the input-side (monkey control) :ak:

But why just 26 characters and why reduce it from previous length?

Some systems only allow shorter RADIUS secrets while some allow up to 127 (or even 128) characters. A quick review of the RADIUS RFC and it looks to me like anything up to 253 characters is possible... but due to the way it is implemented some choose to go as short as 16 characters. FreeRADIUS, is limited to 31 characters.

It seems to me that a length of 63 is a nice number that works out well with other PSK lengths (e.g. wireless encryption keys)... barring that, 31 seems like another logical number based on FreeRADIUS limiting it to that for some arbitrary reason.


I do not think we had a limit before?

Why 26, well that is what fits in the box.

I will discuss with Eric and see if we will increase this limit or not.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

User avatar
Uintadave
Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Evanston, WY
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Wed Jan 20, 2016 6:58 pm

Good day fellas.

I wanted to report that we are still having problems with ping watchdog with ver 1.3.9rc13.


I woke up this morning and the stupid Ubnt Rocket Ti was down again.

I logged into the POE to verify that it could not ping the radio.
Screenshot 2016-01-20 08.28.13.png


I then verified the watchdog setting.
Screenshot 2016-01-20 08.28.34.png


I then bounced the port manually.
Screenshot 2016-01-20 08.29.05.png


Then the POE can ping it again. The watchdog did not do its job.
Screenshot 2016-01-20 08.30.20.png



Here is a little info on our setup. the POE is on its own subnet connected directly to the router. 172.20.1.50
When it is trying to get to the antenna it goes through the router and the router routes it to the core where it then takes an MPLS tunnel back to the site and to the radio. The router and the POE clearly did not have communication with the radio yet it would not trip the watchdog.

User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7416
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1608 times
Been thanked: 1325 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:39 pm

I pinged Eric (the programmer) to look into this and reach out to you on this thread
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

User avatar
Eric Stern
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:45 am

Uintadave wrote:Good day fellas.

I wanted to report that we are still having problems with ping watchdog with ver 1.3.9rc13.


Hopefully enabling debugging will help track this down. From the command line (use the "cmdline" command at the CLI) run these two commands:
Code: Select all
 touch /pinger_debug
/etc/init.d/pinger restart


This will clutter up your log, but if you send me the contents of your log the next time it happens it should help me figure out what is going on.

User avatar
Uintadave
Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Evanston, WY
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:08 pm

ok I did that but this is what I got:



BusyBox v1.19.4 (2015-12-17 16:22:08 EST) built-in shell (ash)

Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.


Marbleton WT POE# cmdline


BusyBox v1.19.4 (2015-12-17 16:22:08 EST) built-in shell (ash)

Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.


admin@Marbleton_WT_POE:/www# touch /pinger_debug

admin@Marbleton_WT_POE:/www# /etc/init.d/pinger restart

start-stop-daemon: warning: killing process 3772: No such process

admin@Marbleton_WT_POE:/www#


Does this mean that the pinger itself died?

User avatar
Eric Stern
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:47 pm

Yes, that is what that would mean. If pinger is dying that would explain why its not working. But pinger should never die unless it has nothing to do (ie there are no ping watchdogs configured).

Well, keep an eye on the log. You should get a fairly constant stream of messages from pinger while its running.

User avatar
Uintadave
Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Evanston, WY
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:26 pm

nothing is nothing in the log. how do I make sure it is running?

User avatar
Uintadave
Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:36 pm
Location: Evanston, WY
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: v1.3.9rcX - BETA/Release Candidate

Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm

wow... i must be tired...

I checked again and the pinger is now loging and letting me know it is successful.

PreviousNext
Return to Hardware and software issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests