v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

DOWNLOAD THE LATEST FIRMWARE HERE
User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7416
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1608 times
Been thanked: 1325 times

v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:01 pm

Please post comments and report bugs with v1.4.6 in this thread.

PLEASE DO NOT REPORT ISSUES UNLESS YOU HAVE TRIED THE LATEST VERSION AVAILABLE FIRST.

v1.4.6 wrote:FIXED/CHANGED
- Fixed dot1dStpRootPort SNMP stat showing the wrong port number
- Fixed layout on small windows (mobile and desktop)

ENHANCEMENTS

KNOWN ISSUES
- Some language templates need help - please contact us to help

Released 11/25/2016


v1.4.5 wrote:FIXED/CHANGED
- Fixed voltage fluctuation that affected a small percentage of WS-6-MINI, WS-8-150-AC, WS-8-150-DC
- Updated SSH daemon to get more modern key exchange algorithm
- Watchdog no longer checks for link on port to be bounced
- Ignore the SFP ports when checking Priority values
- Changed throttle limits between switch core and CPU
- Fixed web UI login only using the first 8 characters of the password
- Removed Address from MODBUS configuration
- Fixed reset button on WS-6-MINI broken since v1.4.1
- Fixed web UI display for mobile devices
- Fixed dot1dStpRootCost SNMP stat being off by one

ENHANCEMENTS
- Added option to bounce link instead of POE for watchdog rules
- Added support for 1000BASE-BX SFP modules (including Fiberstore SFP-GE-BX)
- Added ability to configure QoS based on packet headers (MAC, IP, TCP ports, etc)
- Added support for Mikrotik S-RJ01 SFP module
- Show the SFP model number in UI
- Skip PoE watchdog if PoE is not turned on for a port
- Changed default Revert Timer value from 60 to 180 seconds
- Added range for DSCP and PCP values in QoS rules
- Removed DSCP and PCP mappings from QoS config

KNOWN ISSUES
- Some language templates need help - please contact us to help

Released 11/15/2016
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

IntL-Daniel
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 5:07 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Fri Nov 25, 2016 7:46 pm

Is there a fix in 1.4.6 for the issue reported for 1.4.5 about the Q7?

IntL-Daniel wrote:
I have upgraded to 1.4.5 from 1.4.4. Previously I had configured QOS port mappings. After the upgrade, all QOS settings were gone and I had to set it again. But before I entered any rule all ports already counted packtes to Q7? For me sounds like the similar bug like previously this "- Fixed utility packets using Tx Q1 instead of Q0" ?

User avatar
Eric Stern
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:34 pm

No changes regarding that. Could be that some packets slipped into Q7 before QoS was completely configured.

IntL-Daniel
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 5:07 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:14 am

So I decided do a test again. I disabled all QOS rules for Q7, then reset port counters and this is the result 1 minute later (just remeber I am on 1.4.6 and the same was in 1.4.5, not in 1.4.4):

Image
Another reported issue with mobile view and imposibility to click options "per port" on main status page also still persist :-( Does anyone care about my reports?

Ludvik
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:50 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Sun Nov 27, 2016 11:33 am

I agree. I have one switch, one uplink, none other ports connected (traffic from and to switch is only management - SNMP, web, ssh and sometimes OSPF hello packet). TX Q7 is big number ... fifth times more than TX Q0. Scheduler is WRR.
RX Q7 is ZERO.

netonix_queues.png

User avatar
Eric Stern
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Sun Nov 27, 2016 12:45 pm

IntL-Daniel wrote:So I decided do a test again. I disabled all QOS rules for Q7, then reset port counters and this is the result 1 minute later (just remeber I am on 1.4.6 and the same was in 1.4.5, not in 1.4.4):

Image


Q7 is used for sending LACP and STP packets to give them the highest priority.

IntL-Daniel wrote:Another reported issue with mobile view and imposibility to click options "per port" on main status page also still persist :-( Does anyone care about my reports?


It works on my android phone and tablet. Try again, maybe clear the cache or force a reload to make sure it hasn't cached anything from the previous version.

Ludvik
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:50 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:12 pm

Eric Stern wrote:Q7 is used for sending LACP and STP packets to give them the highest priority.

It's good idea :-) Sorry for bug in my brain ... In my example it is about 1 packet in Q7 per two second.

IntL-Daniel
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 5:07 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Sun Nov 27, 2016 3:17 pm

Eric Stern wrote:Q7 is used for sending LACP and STP packets to give them the highest priority.



We have STP and LACP disabled od Netonix and in the whole network but Q7 still counting, is that still correct?

User avatar
mike99
Associate
Associate
 
Posts: 837
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:53 am
Location: Quebec, Canada
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 245 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:28 am

sirhc wrote:- Fixed layout on small windows (mobile and desktop)


Just tested what I reported for desktop on 1.4.5 and it seem to work fine now.
Thanks.

IntL-Daniel
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 5:07 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: v1.4.6 Bug reports and Comments

Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:35 am

Eric Stern wrote:
IntL-Daniel wrote:Another reported issue with mobile view and imposibility to click options "per port" on main status page also still persist :-( Does anyone care about my reports?


It works on my android phone and tablet. Try again, maybe clear the cache or force a reload to make sure it hasn't cached anything from the previous version.


Tested again with these results:
1/ WEB UI is useable only on very fast device (mobile) - i.e. Samsung SIII mini (i8190) is not enough, Samsung S6 is so far so good
2/ Options per port are correctly available only up to specific zoom level or without zoom. Below some zoom level the per port options are appeared somewhere down below your selcted port...you have to unzoom to see them (tested with Firefox and embeded Samsung browser). Options per all ports works correctly in any zoom.

Next
Return to Hardware and software issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 56 guests