Passive versus af/at
-
lligetfa - Associate
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 12:12 pm
- Location: Fort Frances Ont. Canada
- Has thanked: 307 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
Passive versus af/at
One thing that sets Netonix apart from Ubiquiti is sticking with passive PoE for both voltages. I wonder what drove that decision? Personally I don't trust af/at auto detection in a hostile outdoor environment where one might get water in the cable, ground potential shift, or where surge protectors could affect the sensing. I don't really think there is a place for auto detection in a carrier network. Leave that to the SOHO and enterprise IT market.
-
mike99 - Associate
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:53 am
- Location: Quebec, Canada
- Has thanked: 95 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Passive versus af/at
Seem like a decision to target the entreprise market. What I think is that sell must have been slowing down on the WISP market. AC isn't a game changer so I don't really expect WISP to renew their network until AC phase 2 (MU-MIMO). Until then, Ubnt must continue to sell device.
2 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests