Wish I knew how to do this but it is a bit foreign to me. I have a Netonix on both ends of a wireless link. We just installed a new licensed radio on that link so there are now two radio links between the switches - acting as backhauls. Right now, we have the port at the far end for the new radio turned off until we configure this properly.
What I am after is having all traffic pass over the new licensed link (port 2 on both ends) unless it goes down - then run all traffic over the old unlicensed link (port 4 at the far end).
I am assuming this is a STP configuration but I am not sure how to configure it and if it needs to be configured on both ends or just the far (client) end.
Current STP configuration at the client end image is uploaded. Sorry for such a simple question...
Proper STP configuration for back-up link
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7422
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 1326 times
Re: Proper STP configuration for back-up link
I would use Path Cost to determine which link you want to have used first.
You would set the path cost on both switches.
Read this and understand RSTP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanning_ ... e_Protocol
Our switches follow the IEEE protocol standards:
STP - 802.1D
RSTP - 802.1W
MSTP - 802.1S
LACP - 802.1ad
And our UI/CLI use standard nomenclature / verbiage so a simple read of wikipedia should answer all your questions.
In your case you could enable both links with RSTP enabled to prevent a loop then play with the costs and make sure the one you want is getting used first.
Then you can test your failover by logging into the primary link and telling the radio to reboot or doing a port bounce in the switch to force the radio to reboot which should cause the link to fail over which you can monitor by using a constant ping across the links.
I am a firm believer in the whole "teach a man to fish" ideology instead of simply giving people the answer.
You would set the path cost on both switches.
Read this and understand RSTP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanning_ ... e_Protocol
Our switches follow the IEEE protocol standards:
STP - 802.1D
RSTP - 802.1W
MSTP - 802.1S
LACP - 802.1ad
And our UI/CLI use standard nomenclature / verbiage so a simple read of wikipedia should answer all your questions.
In your case you could enable both links with RSTP enabled to prevent a loop then play with the costs and make sure the one you want is getting used first.
Then you can test your failover by logging into the primary link and telling the radio to reboot or doing a port bounce in the switch to force the radio to reboot which should cause the link to fail over which you can monitor by using a constant ping across the links.
I am a firm believer in the whole "teach a man to fish" ideology instead of simply giving people the answer.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
2 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests