Nothing changed between v1.4.7 and v1.4.8 to cause this issue.
Sure you can downgrade but I would not as this is NOT the issue.
You provide little information to assist you.
You have a lot of these switches, what model is this we are talking about?
What ports are in the LAG to the router, if they are SFP ports I would look at SFP modules.
Maybe put up some information to help you suchs as the following TABs:
Status
Ports
STP
LAG
VLANs
Put up a portion of the Log showing this event.
v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
lweidig - Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:56 pm
- Location: Sheboygan, WI
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
WS-26-400-AC switch connecting to a CCR1009, here are the tabs for the ports with the issue:
Log file - 100's / 1000's of these:
Dec 11 21:07:51 LACP: LACP changed state to Active on port 1 (key 100)
Dec 11 21:07:51 switch[2866]: LACP changed state to Active on port 1 () (key 100)
Dec 11 21:07:53 sSMTP[2871]: Sent mail for xxx@excel.net (221 Service closing transmission channel) uid=0 username=xxx outbytes=574
The ports are connected with 3' CAT6 cables in a rack.
Log file - 100's / 1000's of these:
Dec 11 21:07:51 LACP: LACP changed state to Active on port 1 (key 100)
Dec 11 21:07:51 switch[2866]: LACP changed state to Active on port 1 () (key 100)
Dec 11 21:07:53 sSMTP[2871]: Sent mail for xxx@excel.net (221 Service closing transmission channel) uid=0 username=xxx outbytes=574
The ports are connected with 3' CAT6 cables in a rack.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
So these are the only things I can think to try:
I know you say the cables are good cables but try differnt cables. CAT6 is not needed, use simple CAT5e. The reason I say this is some CAT6 Cables put stress on the RJ45 connectors being thicker heavier cable. - GRASPING AT STRAWS but I have seen bad cables do this.
Make sure there is nothing wrong with one of the ports in one of the switches, try differnt ports in the LACP LAG one at a time.
If you have a spare switch swap one out at a time.
If you try all the above and no love I would look at the router.
Your setup looks fine so it has to be something in cabling, a bad port, a bad switch, or a bad port in the router or something with the router.
You could also use a Static LAG just to see if the issue goes away which may point to how the router is doing LACP? I know we are handling LACP right as this was tested in our LABs with other switches. I also run LACP all over my net at my WISP with no issue.
I know you say the cables are good cables but try differnt cables. CAT6 is not needed, use simple CAT5e. The reason I say this is some CAT6 Cables put stress on the RJ45 connectors being thicker heavier cable. - GRASPING AT STRAWS but I have seen bad cables do this.
Make sure there is nothing wrong with one of the ports in one of the switches, try differnt ports in the LACP LAG one at a time.
If you have a spare switch swap one out at a time.
If you try all the above and no love I would look at the router.
Your setup looks fine so it has to be something in cabling, a bad port, a bad switch, or a bad port in the router or something with the router.
You could also use a Static LAG just to see if the issue goes away which may point to how the router is doing LACP? I know we are handling LACP right as this was tested in our LABs with other switches. I also run LACP all over my net at my WISP with no issue.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
lweidig - Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:56 pm
- Location: Sheboygan, WI
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
Was able to perform more diagnostics on this over the evening. Cable swaps has no affect on the situation. During this though we noticed one of the ports (not part of the LACP group) had much higher response times than the others. It was connected to a Cambium ePMP 2000. When that device was power cycled ALL of the issues went away!
Now, why would this happen? Seems there is some sort of issue that a single port could affect other ports so significantly.
If possible Chris can you move these posts off to their own topic so the discussion can continue with it not being part of the 1.4.8 issues topic. Thanks!
Now, why would this happen? Seems there is some sort of issue that a single port could affect other ports so significantly.
If possible Chris can you move these posts off to their own topic so the discussion can continue with it not being part of the 1.4.8 issues topic. Thanks!
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
lweidig wrote:Was able to perform more diagnostics on this over the evening. Cable swaps has no affect on the situation. During this though we noticed one of the ports (not part of the LACP group) had much higher response times than the others. It was connected to a Cambium ePMP 2000. When that device was power cycled ALL of the issues went away!
Now, why would this happen? Seems there is some sort of issue that a single port could affect other ports so significantly.
I am thinking this has something to do with STP?
You should disable STP on ports facing AP's, and make sure STP is disabled in the radio itself:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2748&p=19018&hilit=+RSTP+disable#p19018
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1480&p=16549&hilit=+RSTP+disable#p16549
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1480&p=11011&hilit=+RSTP+disable#p11011
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
lweidig - Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:56 pm
- Location: Sheboygan, WI
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
Had actually tries turning STP off completely on the switch and was still experiencing this. I will review the topics though to see if that should be a best practice going forward as we use these at ALL sites.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.4.8 Bug reports and Comments
lweidig wrote:Had actually tries turning STP off completely on the switch and was still experiencing this. I will review the topics though to see if that should be a best practice going forward as we use these at ALL sites.
So we are back to these suggestion to try.
sirch wrote: So these are the only things I can think to try:
I know you say the cables are good cables but try differnt cables. CAT6 is not needed, use simple CAT5e. The reason I say this is some CAT6 Cables put stress on the RJ45 connectors being thicker heavier cable. - GRASPING AT STRAWS but I have seen bad cables do this. - TRIED THIS NO HELP
Make sure there is nothing wrong with one of the ports in one of the switches, try differnt ports in the LACP LAG one at a time.
If you have a spare switch swap one out at a time.
If you try all the above and no love I would look at the router.
Your setup looks fine so it has to be something in cabling, a bad port, a bad switch, or a bad port in the router or something with the router.
You could also use a Static LAG just to see if the issue goes away which may point to how the router is doing LACP? I know we are handling LACP right as this was tested in our LABs with other switches. I also run LACP all over my net at my WISP with no issue.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests