v1.4.9 Bug reports and Comments

[rbbjolson]

Typically, one would handle VLAN assignments on the group, not the individual interfaces. This is standard behavior on every other brand of switch I've used. Most of the time, you can still configure VLAN assignments on the individual interfaces, but you wouldn't want to because it introduces a source of possible error if the VLAN membership were not the same on every LAG member.

[sirhc]

No, nothing should show up on the VLAN TAB when you define a LAG?

Read what I said in your other post on this: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3362&start=70#p23019

So below I defined a Static LAG, basically the same as LACP as far as VLANs are concerned:
CLICK IMAGE BELOW TO VIEW FULL SIZE

Below is how I handled it on the VLAN TAB, pretty straight forward?
CLICK IMAGE BELOW TO VIEW FULL SIZE

[sirhc]

What you wants is for the software to hold the user's hand with a "LOT" of fuzzy logic that would have to go into the interface and then it would limit what people could do in some cases and could create issues.

If someone is creating a LAG they should simply know to duplicate the same values on each interface that is in a LAG on each defined VLAN as shown in the pictures above.

[sakita]

WS-8-250-DC Board Rev D:

With 1.4.8 the wattages can be displayed for each port individually.

With 1.4.9 only the total wattage is displayed.

So, uh, never mind - ID10T error in progress

Gotta love browser hokey-pokey: In a crappy old version of FireFox the total wattage is all that is ever displayed - clicking on ports does not work (still have to test on newer version). In Chrome 64.0.3282.186 (32-bit) it will display individual wattage by clicking on a port - but once clicked how to get it back to displaying the total wattage (short of logging out) is a mystery.

Browsers: yet another cursed blessing... gotta have at least 3 available for decent odds of getting the job done.

[jakematic]

but once clicked how to get it back to displaying the total wattage (short of logging out) is a mystery.

Click the X on the top right of the graphs on the bottom.

Did a lot of too before finding that in another post...

[sirhc]

WS-8-250-DC Board Rev D:

With 1.4.8 the wattages can be displayed for each port individually.

With 1.4.9 only the total wattage is displayed.

So, uh, never mind - ID10T error in progress

Gotta love browser hokey-pokey: In a crappy old version of FireFox the total wattage is all that is ever displayed - clicking on ports does not work (still have to test on newer version). In Chrome 64.0.3282.186 (32-bit) it will display individual wattage by clicking on a port - but once clicked how to get it back to displaying the total wattage (short of logging out) is a mystery.

Browsers: yet another cursed blessing... gotta have at least 3 available for decent odds of getting the job done.

Click outside the TAB area (the sides), I guess clicking the port row again should unselect it and return to TOTAL. Suggested to programmers already.

[sakita]

tested... works either way... click the X down below like jakematic said or click outside like sirhc said.

Funny enough, apparently I was clicking beside but not far enough to the edge where the gray border is to make it work and the location of the 'x' varies slightly depending on which of my browsers I use (not that I was looking down there or would have been paying attention enough to notice that little rascal down there).
Mystery solved

[jakematic]

On 1.4.9 a credentials change is logged occasionally when making completely unrelated changes:

Code: Select all

Mar 3 08:17:03 UI: Configuration changed by admin (192.168.0.141)
Mar 3 08:17:03 UI: Credentials_Password: changed
Mar 3 08:17:03 UI: Port 8 Name: changed from 'Port 8' to 'Fire Control'
Mar 3 08:17:07 passwd: Password for admin changed by admin


Logged into WS-12-250-AC, changed port name, clicked Save/Apply.
Doesn't seem to bother anything but thought I'd mention it.

[IntL-Daniel]

Any update on this viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3362&p=22673&hilit=1.4.9+qos#p22673 ? We still stay on 1.4.8 to keep our custommers working. Thanks.

[dnixneodevine]

Hi!, dont know if someone have this issue too, sometimes, when i get by snmp sysuptime it gets me higher value (239 days) but the device shows the real uptime, when i reboot the device, all back to normal..

EDIT: if i disable and enable SNMP it fixes this problem.

thks