This never quite got solved in the firmware, but I thought I'd share the workaround I came up with.
Instead of setting my low voltage value in the "Warning Voltage" field, I leave that field set to a very low value that will never be seen operationally, and for warnings I instead pick an unused ethernet port to be my "monitor port", apply power, and set values for its "Power Down" and "Power Up" fields.
https://imgur.com/a/o4BdMKY
This has several advantages:
* The emails that get sent do not cause the switch to reboot. I have tested 23 voltage low/high cycles without encountering a reboot or other problem.
* An email also gets sent when the input voltage recovers to its normal level. This did not happen when using the previous method.
* Separate thresholds can be defined for low voltage vs normal voltage. This avoids sending a bunch of emails if the voltage is dancing on the edge of a threshold.
The disadvantage is that it requires an unused port to dedicate to this purpose.
Sending low voltage warning email causes WS-12-250-DC reboot
-
Stephen - Employee
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2017 8:56 pm
- Has thanked: 85 times
- Been thanked: 181 times
Re: Sending low voltage warning email causes WS-12-250-DC re
Hello JayDee, thank you for posting a work around.
I was never able to replicate this bug. But after a lot of reading the best I can come up with right now is that it is an issue in the ssmtp package.
In the near future I will look into upgrading the package and see if it goes away after that.
I was never able to replicate this bug. But after a lot of reading the best I can come up with right now is that it is an issue in the ssmtp package.
In the near future I will look into upgrading the package and see if it goes away after that.
Re: Sending low voltage warning email causes WS-12-250-DC re
Hey Stephen, Ever get around to updating ssmtp? We're still getting bit by this on our solar sites when warning email is being sent.
Re: Sending low voltage warning email causes WS-12-250-DC re
Stephen,
Any word on the updated SSMTP package?
Any word on the updated SSMTP package?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests