Since Performant is dead can you make something like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk3XB2Ym7T4
Maybe you can even build this into your existing switches.
Keefe
Ring Topology like RFLO
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7415
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: Ring Topology like RFLO
Give us a little time there, that is a pretty big undertaking!
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
- keefe007
- Experienced Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Ring Topology like RFLO
I'll give you four weeks. You can do it!
Heck, you could probably just hire the Performant guy who wrote that software.
Keefe
Heck, you could probably just hire the Performant guy who wrote that software.
Keefe
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7415
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: Ring Topology like RFLO
LOL I do not think so.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
josh - Associate
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:29 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: Ring Topology like RFLO
The Performant leadership and FPGA coders were just Accedian employees sub-tasked to Performant. They still all work for Accedian except for ~4 other employees who got hired on to fill out the team (myself as the public/technical figurehead, Brent Schnell as the channel manager from Moto/Cambium, and two web/marketing people). They're all located at the Montreal, Quebec/CA office in the building shared by Ciena, Bombradier, and others
I think the original tech that RFLO was built on was "wack". Requiring you to just have a ring topology, and only a ring topology, is pretty dumb. If it were originally based on SPB or TRILL, things would have been much different. Anywho, to do the kinds of things they did, it requires expensive FPGA designs at every end-point, and it's a patented meathod. I've thought about it from a few different angles, and can't figure out a way to make the measurements as accurate as they need to be with sub-microsecond latencies and still keep it cheap.
It was a genius idea though.
I think the original tech that RFLO was built on was "wack". Requiring you to just have a ring topology, and only a ring topology, is pretty dumb. If it were originally based on SPB or TRILL, things would have been much different. Anywho, to do the kinds of things they did, it requires expensive FPGA designs at every end-point, and it's a patented meathod. I've thought about it from a few different angles, and can't figure out a way to make the measurements as accurate as they need to be with sub-microsecond latencies and still keep it cheap.
It was a genius idea though.
-
rebelwireless - Experienced Member
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:46 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7415
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: Ring Topology like RFLO
rebelwireless wrote:4 weeks is plenty of time ;)
No pressure right guys!
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
amishgenius - Associate
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:39 pm
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
Re: Ring Topology like RFLO
Why not use Shortest Path Bridging? Even performant only worked in a ring configuration.
-
josh - Associate
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:29 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: Ring Topology like RFLO
I proposed an RFLOv2 to the company to better compete in the WISP space instead of the cell/carrier/metro-e market they were used to, and my idea got shut down pretty fast. They didn't see the importance of a "mesh" design.
And now, they're gone.
And now, they're gone.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests