Been using dude 4.x for four years. Never did use 3.x
In addition, 1.2.2 broke my rancid script as well.
v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
-
Eric Stern - Employee
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 130 times
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
I tried 4.0beta3, it seems to work fine too. If you can figure out a way for me to recreate the problem I'll look into it further.
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
I downgraded to 1.2.0rc8 and my problems disappeared. I am unsure of the cause. I have hundreds of devices being monitored by dude, using v1 and v2 snmp.
Never seen this kind of behaviour before. The interface list keeps updating and never has the full list of interfaces when you 'add a link' between the switch and some other device. The actual graph, it turns out, seems fine. The 'real time display' always shows 0bps.
Just fyi,
JP
Never seen this kind of behaviour before. The interface list keeps updating and never has the full list of interfaces when you 'add a link' between the switch and some other device. The actual graph, it turns out, seems fine. The 'real time display' always shows 0bps.
Just fyi,
JP
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7415
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
Is anyone else having issues with v1.2.2 and SNMP?
Is anyone else using v1.2.2 and the Dude?
Now keep in mind v1.2.2 does not support SNMP v1
PLEASE REPORT EITHER WAY, PROBLEM OR NO PROBLEM
Is anyone else using v1.2.2 and the Dude?
Now keep in mind v1.2.2 does not support SNMP v1
PLEASE REPORT EITHER WAY, PROBLEM OR NO PROBLEM
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
V 1.2.0 and V 1.2.2 will not get a DHCP address on an SFP port from a cold boot. I am trying V 1.1.8 to see if it is there also.
I suspect that the SFP init happens after the dhcp request in the boot sequence?
On cold boot, the unit can be reached at 192.168.1.20 every time.
I suspect that the SFP init happens after the dhcp request in the boot sequence?
On cold boot, the unit can be reached at 192.168.1.20 every time.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7415
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
I forwarded this post Eric to take a look at.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
I can verify that DHCP client does not work at all on 250-AC-12 or 250-AC on version 1.2.2 on any port
You can change it from the interface and it will acquire a DHCP address. Upon reboot it never does again.
JP
You can change it from the interface and it will acquire a DHCP address. Upon reboot it never does again.
JP
-
Eric Stern - Employee
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:41 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 130 times
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
I tested 1.2.2 in the lab with a WS-12-250-AC. I tested ports 1 and 12 and both SFP ports, with both cold boots and reboots. DHCP worked perfectly every time.
You may need to do a wireshark capture to see what is going wrong with yours.
You may need to do a wireshark capture to see what is going wrong with yours.
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
I pulled a perfectly working TSPro and put this in its place. Same Port. SameDHCP server. No go.
It's directly connected to a Mikrotik router. Nothing in between.
I'm not a complete moron. I'm only reporting the behaviour I observe.
And, on a side note, it appears that Vlan trunking is broken as well. :)
It's directly connected to a Mikrotik router. Nothing in between.
I'm not a complete moron. I'm only reporting the behaviour I observe.
And, on a side note, it appears that Vlan trunking is broken as well. :)
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7415
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: v1.2.2 FINAL bug reports and comments
I am using VLAN trunking with v1.2.2 and it works for me?
Can anyone else please confirm what they are seeing as to VLAN trunking and if you have your switch getting an IP address OK?
I can not confirm the DHCP with my WISP deployments as I only use static IPs
Can anyone else please confirm what they are seeing as to VLAN trunking and if you have your switch getting an IP address OK?
I can not confirm the DHCP with my WISP deployments as I only use static IPs
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 40 guests