VLAN no working on WS-12-250B

[smaicas]

We are planing to change aroung 100 TOUGHSwitch for a WS-12-250B and we have try a pilot firt but ??

I have change a UBNT TOUGHSwitch for a WS-12-250B and now clients that use vlan as interface to open pppoe_client are not working.
It seems
..The Netonix does not pass VLAN traffic . I configured the ports as trunk ports but the problem persists . This doing wrong . With UBNT equipment works perfectly .


THANKS

[sirhc]

A lot of people are using these switches fine so my guess is something is not right.

1) What firmware version you are using, make sure you are using version 1.2.4

2) Please post up your config tabs along with a simple network diagram and detailed explanation would help

My guess is your MTU is too small, try setting the MTU on all the ports to 1528

Do not turn Trunk Ports on unless you need to, especially not on all ports.

[smaicas]

1.- firmware is 1.2.4
2.- Config very simple a PPPoE server on Port7 work on MikroTik over vlan 101 and a client (MikroTik) that open a PPPoE_cliente over vlan101, if i connect with a simple swith its work
3.- MTU is 1528


VLAN config


I need to made any change

[adairw]

The way you have your switch configured will never work. you haven't configured VLAN 101 on any ports or enabled trunking.

[smaicas]

I have try with this opstions

TRUNK --> NOT WORK



VLAN 101 --> NOT WORK





VLAN101 + TRUNK --> NOT WORK

[sirhc]

So you want to pass VLAN 101 Traffic between ports 7 and 8?

The only VLAN you have configured is the default VLAN ID 1 and you have all "U"ntaged filters on the ports.

Ports 1-12 are all setup to accept "U"ntagged traffic.

Try creating a VLAN 101 and putting a "T"agged on ports 7 and 8.

This tell the switch that it will receive/accept packets that are Tagged with VLAN ID 101 in on port 7 or 8 and pass them through to port 7 or 8 and out and tho retain the VLANID Tag.

A "U" tell the switch that packets that come to it "U"ntagged will be accepted and packets without a VLAN "T"ag of whatever the VLAN ID is will be refused, dropped, or filtered however you want to look at it.

101.jpg (84.26 KiB) Viewed 7044 times

If you want to define the VLAN on the MT such as a sub-interface but have packets exit and enter port 8 without the VLAN ID Tag of 101 then put a U on port 8 on VLAN 101, this tells the switch that packets coming from the MT will have a VLAN Tag of 101 but when the switch pushes the packet out port 8 it will strip the VLAN tag off. Then when packets from a device in port 8 enter the switch without a VLAN Tag of 101 the switch will add the VLAN Tag of 101 before it pushes the packet out port 7 to the MT.

[sirhc]

LOL - A lot of responses while we each type.

I am not sure what is going wrong for you, I know VLANs work fine with the switch as I run them on all of my towers which you can see in this post viewtopic.php?f=30&t=452

My guess is something is wrong in the end point configurations?

[smaicas]

Port 7 is a port for conectivity and used for vlan101 an other vlans then if put the value to "E" maybe trafic without vlan not work.

my actual UBNT config is TOUGHSWITH (NO VLANS) --> MTK SECTOR --> MTK CLIENTS ( ANY WITH VLAN a other WITH NO VLAN)

I
also
use
VLANs
to group
some
ETH1
and interconnect
different
link.
For example
all traffic from
the
Ether3
or
ether4
(with or without
VLAN)
interconnect
with
ether5
.
And
ether6
and
ether7
(with or without
VLAN)
interconnect
with
ether1
.


What can i do ?

[adairw]

It sounds like his mikrotik or whatever PPPoE thing is expecting untagged traffic not tagged.
try untagging one or both ports in vlan 101.

As Chris states, VLAN's work fine. Every switch in our network has 10-15 vlans configured in various configurations.

[adairw]

post some screen shots of how the toughswitch is configured.